thats covered in the followup message 0x29, is that duplicated in both packets?
also if that packet had that extra u32 and we weren't parsing it, it would error out about mismatched pkt length.
thats covered in the followup message 0x29, is that duplicated in both packets?
also if that packet had that extra u32 and we weren't parsing it, it would error out about mismatched pkt length.
why is C3 changed here? its being used already and works fine?
The struct missed the amount being dropped if you dropped a partial stack of an item
thats covered in the followup message 0x29, is that duplicated in both packets?
also if that packet had that extra u32 and we weren't parsing it, it would error out about mismatched pkt length.
sega duplicated it.
e1a8ad7fc5
.